Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tomas Machac vs Robin Stanek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Machac vs Stanek analysis and find out who is favored!
Tomas Machac vs Robin Stanek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Machac 1 - 1 Stanek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Machac has won 51.27% of points on their second serve, while Stanek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Machac, in recent form, has won 52.73% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stanek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.35% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Machac has saved 60.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stanek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Machac has won 70.89% of matches played (W/L 56/ 23), with Stanek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Machac has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 84/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 5/ 4). Stanek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 79/ 36), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 111/ 111).
- Player level: In the last year, Machac has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.41% of matches (W/L 21/ 8), where as Stanek has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Machac winning 1 times and Stanek being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Machac winning 2 and Stanek winning 2. The last match between Machac and Stanek was at the Czech Republic F7 (Liberec), 24-10-2018, First, Carpet with Tomas Machac getting the victory 6-3 7-6(7).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Machac and Stanek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Machac winning 0 times and Stanek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Machac winning 1, and Stanek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Machac has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.47 while Stanek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Machac has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stanek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Machac has converted 44.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stanek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
34
Rank
34
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
258
High
29
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
67% (242-118)
Career Total W/L
56% (246-192)
69% (22-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,492,625
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tomas Machac | Robin Stanek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 18 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:30 | 1:31:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (75/140) | 70% (93/133) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (48/75) | 71% (66/93) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (36/65) | 48% (19/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 42% (5/12) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (48/133) | 40% (56/140) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(7) |
Stats 
Tomas Machac
Player
Robin Stanek
51%
(
38 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
13
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Tomas Machac
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tomas Machac | Robin Stanek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (22/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (52/31) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (434/377) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 150 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:35 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 192 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (1581/2488) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1126/1581) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (465/907) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (103/229) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (1003/2549) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 71% (12/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (18/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 53% (8/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (20/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (20/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Tomas Machac Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Tomas Machac
62%
(
93 of
149)
1st Serve %
63%
(
86 of
136)
14
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
2
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
52 of
86)
50%
(
28 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
40%
(
60 of
149)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
55 of
136)
144
Total Points Won
141
|
7-6(4) 7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Mariano Navone
63%
(
84 of
134)
1st Serve %
68%
(
84 of
123)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
48 of
84)
42%
(
21 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
10 of
39)
71%
(
10 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
46%
(
61 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
65 of
123)
138
Total Points Won
119
|
6-2 6-1 3-6 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Nuno Borges
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
5
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
56 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(3) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Tomas Machac
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Novak Djokovic
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
84
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
10
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Jack Draper
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
23 of
28)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
19 of
57)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Tomas Machac
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Robin Stanek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Robin Stanek
72%
(
87 of
121)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
116
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Milan Welte
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Jan Satral
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
7 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
42
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Robin Stanek
56%
(
9 of
16)
1st Serve %
81%
(
13 of
16)
5
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
22
Total Points Won
10
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Kaichi Uchida
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Matyas Cerny
59%
(
55 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
102
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Palosi
Player
Robin Stanek
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
84%
(
58 of
69)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Stanek
Player
Adria Soriano Barrera
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
0
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Liska
Player
Robin Stanek
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
82%
(
58 of
71)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Machac Vs Stanek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
